Group: pgsql.docs


Subject: Mentioning Slony in docs
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 11/8/2007 10:22:48 AM
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of > the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that. The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution fits everyone's needs. I don't think the core docs should be pushing Slony more than other solutions. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq