THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF: PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE In article <ui1rl1134p4o5v2aggtn0f3ksfpc6slnsk@4ax.com> George Firestone <firestone@bellsouth.net> wrote: | | Have been unable to get articles posted using QS this week. | | Kindly advise: | Which m2N are still working? | | Which remailers still work, that allow different FROM ? | | TIA (SNIP) As you can see I use mail2news@dizum.com and have never had any problems. There are a few good remailers that allow nondescript "From" headers, "dingo" being very reliable and "italy", when it comes back aboard. I'm sure others will fill in the correct M2Ns' you're looking for and give you a better list of "from header" remailers. <<==========>> Subject: Re: to min, seriously In article <435f7509$0$74291$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net> "zod" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > > > NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.9.247.77 (?) C'mon, figure it out yourself. <<==========>> Subject: Re: Moron flooder "eelbash" was "Frog" In article <S6D92E5538644.0064236111@reece.net.au> Dermott McDermott <dermcderm@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > Somebody named Secure Beer has been mentioned as the floodr or at least one of the biggest flooders. I am not sure of his reason for flooding if he is the flooder, but something about wanting to make the remailer system his way and being blocked by frog admin? I mean frog admin found him flooding or something from the headers of his messages. And since then this Secure Beer has been having an unending hissy fit and floods and so on, sort of like a baby stamping his foot. > > If that is correct why do you think it is? Is it that the majority of internet users do not see the importance of Freedom of Speech the way remops do? Hi Eelbash! Yes, we *still* know this is you. Try harder, you get no points for effort on this post.