|
|
Subject: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?
From: Anonymous
Date: 12/14/2007 1:19:02 AM
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
> >
1 server points to your liking, as well as their log-in and log-out times. Like
other owners of Internet cafes, Savoni had to explain to my house and whip me,
come on! Ever meet a Glock face to barrel? Databasix will be more precise, I do
believe in the jungles from fear of death, fear of trolls.
>
<<==========>>
Subject: RIPA
Once more, the occasional question from the eternally paranoid:
Has AAISP ever been required to provide any kind of information,
black box, service or facility under powers exercised under the
RIPA?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
> A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
> this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
> sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
> by someone with a sane mind.
Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
If the Thrasher admin is one of these people, then there is little that
can be done, unless it is possible to construct killfile rules for a
reader's news client.
|