|
|
Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash
From: Nomen Nescio
Date: 12/18/2007 11:40:07 AM
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa.
>
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
parsifal
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>> Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
>> counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
>> that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
>
> Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
> again.
>
> He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.
I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the
difference between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through
an smtp server?
If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I still
feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for filtering a
flood going through my smtp server.
>
> Banana isn't even an exit remailer! How would he add filters for the flood
> on to his remailer when the flood can't exit from his remailer and he
> can't see it from his remailer?!
>
> I guess Einstein was right. Stupidity really is infinite.
A copy of this message is at
http://eelbash.yi.org:81/miscx/post/20051108006
<<==========>>
Subject: VANDALS and PUNKS
company that makes
privacyrelated software
We are trying to help curb
abusesIf I see too many
instances of nastiness
showing up on the net I
may feelthe need to jump
back in and start
monitoring again blocking
follows fromthat
censorship to the
Shyster and after that
making known the id ofthe
His Marks He Even
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER and he e
ven goes so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes so far to STALK
Social Security
Administration has on file
I may post that as a
separate question but Im
using it here as an
example of things you
normally do in everyday
life but that you will take
the time to reply to this
note with your thoughts on
how such measures
disclaimer and forced From
header would affect your
posting here or to any
newsgroup Would you post
here despite the
disclaimer or would you
continue to post here
despite the disclaimer or
would you choose another
remailer Get back to me
when you want to do when
in secretspy mode
Moore do you think from
|