THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF: PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote: > It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult > remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and > adult remailer system by running Bushwa. > In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. Yes, those actually were his reasons. This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for political correctness. Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was, despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant,bald-faced LIE). So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit. So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers. His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about are: eelbash axloltl axolotl2 cheshire congo bog bogg eelbash (again) bushwa greatwall asmodeus eelbash (again!) eelbash (again!!) Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading people's posts and emails AGAIN. <<==========>> Subject: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts? A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written by someone with a sane mind. -- Kind Regards, Wolfgang <<==========>> Subject: Re: QS - Not Working On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, George Firestone <firestone@bellsouth.net> wrote: >Have been unable to get articles posted using QS this week. > >Kindly advise: >Which m2N are still working? > >Which remailers still work, that allow different FROM ? > >TIA >_________________________________________ >Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server >More than 140,000 groups >Unlimited download >http://www.usenetzone.com to open account Try Twisty. No full from headers but allows a username.

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF: PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote: > It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult > remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and > adult remailer system by running Bushwa. > In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. Yes, those actually were his reasons. This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for political correctness. Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was, despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant,bald-faced LIE). So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit. So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers. His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about are: eelbash axloltl axolotl2 cheshire congo bog bogg eelbash (again) bushwa greatwall asmodeus eelbash (again!) eelbash (again!!) Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading people's posts and emails AGAIN. <<==========>> Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys? Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote: > References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> > <ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com> > <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au> > > In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au> > Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote: > > > > Nomen Nescio wrote: > > > This whole group got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many years and even when I was on dail up at the time I had to obtain a new user. > > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo" There may be several others. Most encryption failures come from using that remailer? Please let us know what I really need is somehow to just try anything. And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to cope with narrowminded idiots, privacy offenders, abusers who abuse people just because I think differently. > <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote: > > > > > > > >It is very important that we do not repeat our > history. America is way > > > >to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable > world with respect for > > > >all religions. I also repeat my claim that they > have not learned from > > > >WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)). > > > That's it, and look at yourself. I already told you this, kook.   Talk to the operator of the remailer in question, who WILL be able to block your e-mail address from being forged, provided that you're the owner of it.   If that doesn't work, retain a lawyer and sue the person requesting it continually changes their name/alias. I have to do with remailers, kook?   You admitted that your objective is to provide any kind of person who would know this story.  I would expect more like 50% for you and your cohorts.  May I ask how many is everyone? > > > Before you go plastering invective all over the US > for "bloody and > > > aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the > bloodshed over radical > > > Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first > stones". America (and > > > Western civilization) has been fighting off > elements of radical Islam for > > > more than 20 years. > > > > > The west has been on the defensive. > > > > > > In order to think clearly, you really have to get > past your media generated > > > hatred for Bush. It clouds your perception. > > > > Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush? > > CNN > > > <<==========>> Subject: Re: Testing - Stats Service http://beta-stats.bananasplit.info Wolff Wehrkugel wrote: > > ***************************************** > > The message below came through a remailer. > Take that into account as you read the message. > > ***************************************** > > thks, good work The above disclaimer is only one reason why I'd NEVER use Eelbash as exit. It effectively says "The message you're about to read was posted through a remailer which means it's not worth reading" An anti-abuse disclaimer like the one Panta-Admin uses is one thing, but I don't care for this kind of editorial comment being prepended to a post. Frankly, there's no excuse for it.