Subject: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 12/3/2007 5:49:37 PM
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
> I got some SGML errors:
> https://devrim.privatepaste.com/501oMnwCYw
Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using? It seems more
prone to get confused by non-entity-ized '<' and '>' than what the
rest of us are using.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Subject: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 12/3/2007 6:51:46 PM
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 17:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using?
> The ones supplied with Fedora 8.
> sgml-common: 0.6.3
> openjada: 1.3.2
Those are the same version numbers I see in Fedora 6, which doesn't
behave like that ... Anyway, I've committed some cleanup in HEAD.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
Subject: Is postgres.gif missing in cvs?
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 12/3/2007 6:57:04 PM
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmph. What version of the SGML tools are you using? It seems more
>> prone to get confused by non-entity-ized '<' and '>' than what the
>> rest of us are using.
> I'm not totally au fait with the rules of SGML. Does it allow literal
> '<' in text nodes? In most places I looked in our docs we seem to use
> '<' as I would have expected.
It appears to me that the tools will silently take < (and also &)
as literal characters, *if* what follows them happens to not look
too much like a tag or entity :-(. Pretty ugly. The particular
cases that were biting Devrim seemed to all be occurrences of <>
which perhaps is an allowed tag in his release.
I found out that -wxml will cause openjade to warn about these cases.
It turns on a boatload of other warnings that we probably don't care
about, so I'm not going to recommend using it by default, but it
enabled me to find a lot of problem spots just now.
Oh, another interesting behavior that was turned up by this ---
apparently you can get away with leaving off the ";" in "<",
because we had done so in a few places. -wxml catches that too.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
|