|
|
Subject: autovacuum: recommended?
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 11/19/2007 10:23:18 AM
Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> FWIW, 20k rows isn't all that big, so I'm assuming that the
> descriptions make the table very wide. Unless those descriptions are
> what's being updated frequently, I suggest you put those in a
> separate table (vertical partitioning). That will make the main table
> much easier to vacuum, as well as reducing the impact of the high
> churn rate.
Uh, you do realize that the TOAST mechanism does that pretty much
automatically?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
|