"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Here's an updated version of the patch. There was a bogus assertion in > the previous one, comparing against mdsync_cycle_ctr instead of > mdunlink_cycle_ctr. Applied with minor corrections. I'm not sure whether we should consider back-patching this. Thoughts? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate