Subject: Terminal width for help output
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 11/15/2007 4:04:46 PM
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
I think 79 is still a reasonable maximum. AFAIK 80 columns is still a
pretty standard terminal window width, but if you try to print in the
last column you may get unexpected extra blank lines.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Subject: Terminal width for help output
From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane)
Date: 11/15/2007 5:09:38 PM
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Also it would rock if translation kept the alignment in various output.
Theoretically the translators are supposed to do that already ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
|