Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/17/2007 7:55:30 AM
* amicus_curious fired off this tart reply:
> "Shannon Jacobs" <Shannon.Jacobs.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ce177f94-6fa8-40e8-92ce-00decb3af3c4@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> Interesting reports there. Mostly just wanted to note that I finally
>> managed to order mine on the reverse twofer offer, and I'm looking
>> forward to finding out if it's as interesting as it sounds.
>
> Well, happy cranking.
You are lacking in the accuracy department.
No surprise there.
--
Tux rox!
Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/18/2007 7:36:13 PM
* Jerry McBride fired off this tart reply:
> amicus_curious wrote:
>
>> Well, happy pulling then, and watch out for the RIAA if you are eagerly
>> sharing. Don't admit to anything.
>
> Sage advise from a known windows user...
As in "Parsley, sage, rosemary, and thyme"?
Ooops. I suppose they'll be after me for royalties for quoting those
lyrics.
--
Tux rox!
Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/20/2007 11:23:16 AM
* The Ghost In The Machine fired off this tart reply:
> Best I can do is CBS Studios, recorded December 1965,
> according to Wikipedia. Columbia Legacy re-released
> it 2001-08-21, adding four new songs.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sounds_of_Silence_%28album%29
Glen Campbell played guitar for them? Never knew that!
> http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/2240
Shake dat spear, Willie!
--
Tux rox!
Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/17/2007 7:55:30 AM
* amicus_curious fired off this tart reply:
> "Shannon Jacobs" <Shannon.Jacobs.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ce177f94-6fa8-40e8-92ce-00decb3af3c4@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> Interesting reports there. Mostly just wanted to note that I finally
>> managed to order mine on the reverse twofer offer, and I'm looking
>> forward to finding out if it's as interesting as it sounds.
>
> Well, happy cranking.
You are lacking in the accuracy department.
No surprise there.
--
Tux rox!
|