Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy


Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/17/2007 7:55:30 AM
* amicus_curious fired off this tart reply: > "Shannon Jacobs" <Shannon.Jacobs.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ce177f94-6fa8-40e8-92ce-00decb3af3c4@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> Interesting reports there. Mostly just wanted to note that I finally >> managed to order mine on the reverse twofer offer, and I'm looking >> forward to finding out if it's as interesting as it sounds. > > Well, happy cranking. You are lacking in the accuracy department. No surprise there. -- Tux rox!

Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/18/2007 7:36:13 PM
* Jerry McBride fired off this tart reply: > amicus_curious wrote: > >> Well, happy pulling then, and watch out for the RIAA if you are eagerly >> sharing. Don't admit to anything. > > Sage advise from a known windows user... As in "Parsley, sage, rosemary, and thyme"? Ooops. I suppose they'll be after me for royalties for quoting those lyrics. -- Tux rox!

Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/20/2007 11:23:16 AM
* The Ghost In The Machine fired off this tart reply: > Best I can do is CBS Studios, recorded December 1965, > according to Wikipedia. Columbia Legacy re-released > it 2001-08-21, adding four new songs. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sounds_of_Silence_%28album%29 Glen Campbell played guitar for them? Never knew that! > http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/2240 Shake dat spear, Willie! -- Tux rox!

Subject: The One Laptop Per Child XO is an "Incredible Device"
From: Linonut
Date: 12/17/2007 7:55:30 AM
* amicus_curious fired off this tart reply: > "Shannon Jacobs" <Shannon.Jacobs.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ce177f94-6fa8-40e8-92ce-00decb3af3c4@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> Interesting reports there. Mostly just wanted to note that I finally >> managed to order mine on the reverse twofer offer, and I'm looking >> forward to finding out if it's as interesting as it sounds. > > Well, happy cranking. You are lacking in the accuracy department. No surprise there. -- Tux rox!