|
|
Subject: Linux preferred. How to deal with pre-installed Vista ... or just forget about it?
From: Rubyxx
Date: 9/13/2007 11:31:59 AM
Maybe the best option is to just install a 2nd hard drive, and put Linux on
that. if you don't have the Windows Vista disk, I wouldn't mess with the
pre-installed drive at all.
Removing Windows Vista entirely is a damned expensive way to install to
Linux.
Rubyxx
"Ton 't Lam" <ton.tlam@casema.nospam.nl> wrote in message
news:70fa9$46dbcf7e$5352f129$8590@cache100.multikabel.net...
> Dear all,
>
> I'm bringing up a new Acer Aspire 5630 (2 Gb mem) for my daughter. She
> worked effortlessly with Linux the last 6 years, and she prefers to use
> this OS. However the Acer comes with a Vista image on the HD. Acer (and
> other manufacturers) don't deliver installation disks, unless bought. So,
> if you want/need these, you have payed twice for the same MicroSoft stuff.
> What a sad situation.
>
> The issue is that starting the new PC will force to install Vista. After
> browsing for some hours, it brought me me to the next options:
>
> 1) Install Vista, and from there load Cygwin to have the desired Linux
> tools, and OpenOffice. This is just a matter of installing. Should be
> straightforward.
>
> 2) Do a partitioning of the HD. I understand partitioning tools comes with
> Vista. Then install Fedora, or Ubuntu on the second partion. What are the
> experiences with this approach ? Thus have Vista dormant available, and
> just use Linux.
>
> 3) Following (2), install VMWare, and have the possibility to launch Vista
> from the first partion, if desired. Or do an image copy to the Linux HD,
> and consider Vista on the first section as the golden image. What are the
> experiences here ? What are the do-s and particularly the don't-s.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Ton
>
|