Subject: Small server hd config?
From: ***** charles
Date: 9/30/2007 7:07:32 PM
Hi all,
I would like to put together a small server with linux.
Is scsi or sata better for file transfer speeds? Is there
any other types of hd connections I should look at?
Does anyone have a benchmark/transfer rate numbers
anywhere?
thanks,
charles.....
Subject: Small server hd config?
From: Dances With Crows
Date: 9/30/2007 7:29:57 PM
***** charles staggered into the Black Sun and said:
> I would like to put together a small server with linux. Is scsi or
> sata better for file transfer speeds? [Are] there any other types of
> hd connections I should look at?
SCSI is faster than SATA if you spend a lot of money on 15K SCSI drives.
If you don't want to do that, you will be better off with SATA in terms
of bang/buck.
> Does anyone have benchmark/transfer rate numbers anywhere?
There are three species of mendacity, each worse than the last: Lies,
damned lies, and benchmarks.
--
A project for developing fully automatically driven cars
(not just those misnamed auto-pilots) has been improved by your
explosive flatulence. --MegaHAL, trained on ASR
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Subject: Small server hd config?
From: Noozer
Date: 9/30/2007 9:22:15 PM
"***** charles" <me@planetearth.com> wrote in message
news:UtSLi.9713$JD.6824@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to put together a small server with linux.
> Is scsi or sata better for file transfer speeds? Is there
> any other types of hd connections I should look at?
> Does anyone have a benchmark/transfer rate numbers
> anywhere?
How are you going to connect the server to other machines? THAT will be your
bottleneck.
|