sdgreen wrote: > > "Karen Gordon" <ar231@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message > news:fiimco$dn5$1@theodyn.ncf.ca... >> (K): Harper's minister of justice, Robert Nicholson, is telling >> us all 'he has no jurisdiction' in the extradition of Schreiber. >> We know he's lying. But the real question is: Why is the Harper >> government so anxious to have Schreiber out of Canada - >> considering they've agreed to a public inquiry on the >> Schreiber/Mulroney affair? >> >> What are you covering up for Mulroney, Harper? Do you really >> expect any Canadian to believe - after these latest antics - that >> you knew nothing about the letters from Schreiber? >> >> You're digging your own political graves over this issue... the >> Opposition parties won't have to do much to bury you. >> __________________________ >> > > > So Karen thinks the Government can simply ignore a Court of Law > which has confirmed that Schrieber is to be extradited. Given that > approach, that means that the Government of BC can tell the > Supreme Court to go to hell and fire all Union members or continue > ripping up labour contracts. After all, her contention is that the > Federal Court is nonsense and the Minister can just over rule its > decisions. > > This would also mean that the Minister could simply ignore all > Courts. Me thinks once a Court makes a decision, that only a > Superior Court can change such on appeal. Don't we just know that if it was someone that was going to testify with possible damage to ANYONE but the Conservatives, Karen would be whining about the HUGE violation of Schreiber's rights and the massive cost to Canadian taxpayers. Air isn't as transparent as Karen Gordon.

"Tom P" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:GG63j.3295$iw1.2680@newsfe22.lga... > Mulroney has been extremely smug. He called for an inquiry the same day > that Harper did. Then he made a speech of how much his family suffered and > that he would be vindicated. All along he knew that Harper was going to > get rid of Schreiber. Mulroney has nothing to worry about with Harper in > the PM's chair. Yep, another broken Harpo promise.

>> (K): Harper's minister of justice, Robert Nicholson, is telling us all 'he >> has no jurisdiction' in the extradition of Schreiber. We know he's lying. >> But the real question is: Why is the Harper government so anxious to have >> Schreiber out of Canada - considering they've agreed to a public inquiry >> on the Schreiber/Mulroney affair? >> >> What are you covering up for Mulroney, Harper? Do you really expect any >> Canadian to believe - after these latest antics - that you knew nothing >> about the letters from Schreiber? >> >> You're digging your own political graves over this issue... the Opposition >> parties won't have to do much to bury you. >> __________________________ "sdgreen" (sd.green@shaw.ca) writes: > So Karen thinks the Government can simply ignore a Court of Law which has > confirmed that Schrieber is to be extradited. [rest of bullshit snipped] (K): DELAYING an extradition to allow someone to testify in a HARPER GOVERNMENT ORDERED INQUIRY is hardly "ignoring a Court of Law". You can try stretching the facts of this issue any way you like, it doesn't change the public perception that Harper - on behalf of Mulroney - is trying to hustle Schreiber out of the country before he can testify. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Government cannot be wiser than the people """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""