Group: ab.politics


Subject: Mulroney Seems Too Confident To Be Guilty
From: bc_nv
Date: 11/15/2007 7:26:44 PM
"Clint Hunter" <ciceroii@rogers.com> wrote in message news:377e6e8b-9fcb-47d5-9107-317e98a3059a@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > This new flare-up of a twenty-year old event, or non event, really > presents nothing new in > the way of evidence. > > Let's face it, Chretien and the whole Canadian Liberal establishment > was out to get Mulroney > with an exhaustive, leave-no-stone-unturned, probe in the 1990s. > Chretien and > his RCMP failed. And Mulroney came > out of it smelling like roses with a handsome libel payoff to boot. > > Now Karlheintz Schreiber, a very shady character, has repeated the > same charge. > But there is no indication that Schreiber has anything new in the way > of evidence. > It would just be his word against that of Mulroney. And most > Canadians, I feel, would > accept Mulroney's testimony over that of Schreiber and partisan > Liberal witch-hunter Stevie Cameron. So would a court and jury if the > case ever went to trial. > > Mulroney is a lawyer. He has been through all this before. He seems > completely confident > and upbeat about the whole affair. Now he is suing a Liberal MP hack > in a $1 million > law suit. If I were a betting man I would be inclined to put my money > on Mulroney. This coming from a guy who wants to devour Ann Coulters hang down. Mulroney is a con man, and Conservatives like you are the mark.

Subject: Mulroney Seems Too Confident To Be Guilty
From: dangdangdoodIe
Date: 11/15/2007 8:30:27 PM
In article <377e6e8b-9fcb-47d5-9107-317e98a3059a@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Clint Hunter <ciceroii@rogers.com> wrote: > This new flare-up of a twenty-year old event, or non event, really > presents nothing new in > the way of evidence. > On the contrary, a show of bravado more often indicates guilt. -- the dang

Subject: Mulroney Seems Too Confident To Be Guilty
From: Clay Northwood
Date: 11/16/2007 12:04:52 AM
-- "Moral nihilism is not the only central feature of National Socialism, but also the common feature between it and Marxism".--scholar Hugh Seton-Watson. "jimjames5417" <jameswright@usa.net> wrote in message news:1900f552-311b-40e5-847f-3de96212d0fb@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 15, 3:22 pm, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:30:27 GMT, dangdangdoodIe >> >> <notea-tha...@islandnet.com> wrote: >> >In article >> ><377e6e8b-9fcb-47d5-9107-317e98a30...@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, >> > Clint Hunter <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote: >> >> >> This new flare-up of a twenty-year old event, or non event, really >> >> presents nothing new in >> >> the way of evidence. >> >> >On the contrary, a show of bravado more often indicates guilt. >> >> Then Chretien & Martin must have been guilty as hell in regards the >> Sponsorship Scandal. > > Barry, surely you know by now thet the left-wing can do no wrong?? > Only Conservatives could possibly be dishonest in their warped minds!! > They will admit Cretin, Martin & Dion were too stupid or negligent to > have known anything about Adscam, and of course the Shawinigangate > hotel and golf course fiasco never happened - in their opinion!~! What happened to the Shawinigate scandal? It appears it was just buried by the Justice Department and the media. There were also big scandals in the Trudeau era re his NEP and then another with grants for a science and technology development funding scheme in which $1 billion went missing. This was buried also by the RCMP and the Justice Department. The Mulroney government terminated the inquiry so there must have been some Red Tory or Tory contributors involved. But it was still largely a Trudeau government scandal and the media wasn't interested.

Subject: Mulroney Seems Too Confident To Be Guilty
From: dangdangdoodIe
Date: 11/16/2007 12:06:58 AM
In article <1900f552-311b-40e5-847f-3de96212d0fb@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, jimjames5417 <jameswright@usa.net> wrote: > On Nov 15, 3:22 pm, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:30:27 GMT, dangdangdoodIe > > > > <notea-tha...@islandnet.com> wrote: > > >In article > > ><377e6e8b-9fcb-47d5-9107-317e98a30...@s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > > Clint Hunter <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote: > > > > >> This new flare-up of a twenty-year old event, or non event, really > > >> presents nothing new in > > >> the way of evidence. > > > > >On the contrary, a show of bravado more often indicates guilt. > > > > Then Chretien & Martin must have been guilty as hell in regards the > > Sponsorship Scandal. > > Barry, surely you know by now thet the left-wing can do no wrong?? > Only Conservatives could possibly be dishonest in their warped minds!! > They will admit Cretin, Martin & Dion were too stupid or negligent to > have known anything about Adscam, and of course the Shawinigangate > hotel and golf course fiasco never happened - in their opinion!~! BTW. Why did Mulroney get $300,000 from Schreiber anyway??? What was the money for?? Why did Mulroney have to go back and ask for an (alledgedly) phoney receipt years after he got the money? How come Mulroney hasn't come out and told us what the deal was yet? Is Mulroney just trying to get away with something because he thinks there's not enough evidence to convict him?? Certainly you must want to know too, just like every other good Canadian.. -- the dang If Harper can not keep the spirit of justice alive in government, the Liberals have already proven they will, even at the possibility of their own demise. By protecting Mulroney, Harper is proving he's unfit for the job.