|
|
Subject: Warmongering Neo-Con Hillier all but admits that Canadian troops will remain in Afghanistan to fight Stephen Harper's illegal American ass kissing war for 10 more years
From: dangdangdoodIe
Date: 10/25/2007 6:44:09 PM
In article <1193331753.237992.129980@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
robertpeffers@aol.com wrote:
> 10 more years for Afghan security, says Hillier
...our own General Betray-us.
> Oct 25, 2007 09:27 AM
> Bill Graveland
> THE CANADIAN PRESS
>
> KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - There is little chance that Afghanistan will
> be able to handle its own security needs any time within the next
> decade, Canada's top soldier said Thursday.
>
> Gen. Rick Hillier made the comment as he wrapped up a three-day
> whirlwind visit to war-torn Kandahar province to meet with commanders
> and troops in the field.
>
> Hillier's frank assessment may come as a disappointment to those
> hoping the Afghan military may be close to being able to operate on
> its own and keep the Taliban in check, thus allowing Canadian troops
> to go home.
>
> "I think most Canadians living in the incredible country that we have
> don't always see all the complexities of trying to rebuild a country
> and, in some cases, build a country from the 25 years of destruction
> that took place in Afghanistan," Hillier told reporters at Kandahar
> Airfield.
>
> The Afghan soldiers that have been trained so far are ``top-notch,"
> Hillier said, but he noted it takes about three years to train a
> single battalion - about 500 to 600 troops.
>
> "You just don't build that overnight and the international community
> will have to be involved for some time to see this through to the
> final level where you've got a government that works effectively,"
> Hillier said.
>
> After years of work and training, there are about two battalions of
> Afghan soldiers in Kandahar province and about 38,000 troops overall.
> It sounds good on paper but is only about half of what is needed for
> Afghanistan to provide its own security.
>
> "An army is what's required to allow them to keep their security, so
> that's a long term project," Hillier said.
>
> "It's going to take 10 years or so just to work through and build an
> army to whatever the final number that Afghanistan will have, and make
> them professional and let them meet their security demands here."
>
> "Canada will decide whatever role it's going to play," Hillier said.
> "The panel is in place and the government will make its decisions."
>
> Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed a five-person panel, headed by
> former Liberal cabinet minister John Manley, to examine options for
> the future of the Afghan mission. The range of options includes the
> continued training of the Afghan army and police, or withdrawing
> altogether.
>
> But the Harper government's throne speech indicated it wants Canada's
> direct involvement in Afghanistan to continue until 2011, two years
> past the current deadline.
>
> Canada has about 2,500 troops serving with NATO's International
> Security Assistance Force, also known as ISAF. Most of them are in
> Kandahar province, a Taliban stronghold in southern Afghanistan where
> the bloodiest fighting during the conflict has taken place.
>
> Since 2002, 71 Canadian military personnel and one diplomat have died
> in Afghanistan. The Canadian government is under public and opposition
> pressure to bring the troops home.
>
> In the short-term, Hillier is hoping to get additional support from
> other NATO allies in terms of helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles
> and more troops.
>
> "What would be best here would be another manoeuvre battalion group to
> give us the flexibility to be able to ... keep a footprint in an area
> where we've been until the Afghan police and army can take that area
> over by themselves," Hillier said.
>
> "That will allow us to manoeuvre off to other areas where the Taliban
> are slightly stronger, and put them on the back foot in those other
> areas."
>
> "With just the one battle group here, even with the Afghan National
> Army forces and the police we are now getting here, we still do not
> have all the capabilities that we have to do."
>
> http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/270396
--
the dang
If You Like Warmonger Bush, You Like Harper
___________
Subject: Warmongering Neo-Con Hillier all but admits that Canadian troops will remain in Afghanistan to fight Stephen Harper's illegal American ass kissing war for 10 more years
From: The Right One
Date: 10/26/2007 1:56:54 AM
"penny" <gorawen@sentex.net > wrote in message
news:42d2i3hhee069fnubm9fvc1l2q2blbhb5v@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:02:33 -0700, robertpeffers@aol.com wrote:
>
>>10 more years for Afghan security, says Hillier
>
>
> And I thought Peter McKay was the Minister of Defence. Who gives
> Hillier this authority?
>
> Is this deja vu all over again? Didn't I read that Hillier was dumped
> because he was usurping the former Minister of Defence's position.
>
> Penny
>
Penny On Youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdt6wcK1cSQ
=========================
--
Terry Pearson
Pro- Israel and proud of it
http://www.therightpoint.ca
Shaping Canada's Destiny
==========================
"I can walk upright"
~Peter White
--------------------------------------------------
Dumbski's obsession
http://wildhorsedories.com/ctv.wmv
Dumbski's rope trick.
"Take two ropes each with two knots.
Tie them together. How many knots are
there now? Yes, there are five knots,
it's proof that 2+2=5.Bet you can't prove
me wrong. "
*********************************************
Liberalism = Entitlement Culture= Corruption
-------------------------------------------
There are some opinions so stupid, only
socialists could hold them.
-------------------------------------------
"It is as useless to argue with those
who have renounced the use of reason
as to administer medication to the dead."
- Thomas Jefferson
-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>>Oct 25, 2007 09:27 AM
>>Bill Graveland
>>THE CANADIAN PRESS
>>
>>KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - There is little chance that Afghanistan will
>>be able to handle its own security needs any time within the next
>>decade, Canada's top soldier said Thursday.
>>
>>Gen. Rick Hillier made the comment as he wrapped up a three-day
>>whirlwind visit to war-torn Kandahar province to meet with commanders
>>and troops in the field.
>>
>>Hillier's frank assessment may come as a disappointment to those
>>hoping the Afghan military may be close to being able to operate on
>>its own and keep the Taliban in check, thus allowing Canadian troops
>>to go home.
>>
>>"I think most Canadians living in the incredible country that we have
>>don't always see all the complexities of trying to rebuild a country
>>and, in some cases, build a country from the 25 years of destruction
>>that took place in Afghanistan," Hillier told reporters at Kandahar
>>Airfield.
>>
>>The Afghan soldiers that have been trained so far are ``top-notch,"
>>Hillier said, but he noted it takes about three years to train a
>>single battalion - about 500 to 600 troops.
>>
>>"You just don't build that overnight and the international community
>>will have to be involved for some time to see this through to the
>>final level where you've got a government that works effectively,"
>>Hillier said.
>>
>>After years of work and training, there are about two battalions of
>>Afghan soldiers in Kandahar province and about 38,000 troops overall.
>>It sounds good on paper but is only about half of what is needed for
>>Afghanistan to provide its own security.
>>
>>"An army is what's required to allow them to keep their security, so
>>that's a long term project," Hillier said.
>>
>>"It's going to take 10 years or so just to work through and build an
>>army to whatever the final number that Afghanistan will have, and make
>>them professional and let them meet their security demands here."
>>
>>"Canada will decide whatever role it's going to play," Hillier said.
>>"The panel is in place and the government will make its decisions."
>>
>>Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed a five-person panel, headed by
>>former Liberal cabinet minister John Manley, to examine options for
>>the future of the Afghan mission. The range of options includes the
>>continued training of the Afghan army and police, or withdrawing
>>altogether.
>>
>>But the Harper government's throne speech indicated it wants Canada's
>>direct involvement in Afghanistan to continue until 2011, two years
>>past the current deadline.
>>
>>Canada has about 2,500 troops serving with NATO's International
>>Security Assistance Force, also known as ISAF. Most of them are in
>>Kandahar province, a Taliban stronghold in southern Afghanistan where
>>the bloodiest fighting during the conflict has taken place.
>>
>>Since 2002, 71 Canadian military personnel and one diplomat have died
>>in Afghanistan. The Canadian government is under public and opposition
>>pressure to bring the troops home.
>>
>>In the short-term, Hillier is hoping to get additional support from
>>other NATO allies in terms of helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles
>>and more troops.
>>
>>"What would be best here would be another manoeuvre battalion group to
>>give us the flexibility to be able to ... keep a footprint in an area
>>where we've been until the Afghan police and army can take that area
>>over by themselves," Hillier said.
>>
>>"That will allow us to manoeuvre off to other areas where the Taliban
>>are slightly stronger, and put them on the back foot in those other
>>areas."
>>
>>"With just the one battle group here, even with the Afghan National
>>Army forces and the police we are now getting here, we still do not
>>have all the capabilities that we have to do."
>>
>>http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/270396
>
Subject: Warmongering Neo-Con Hillier all but admits that Canadian troops will remain in Afghanistan to fight Stephen Harper's illegal American ass kissing war for 10 more years
From: Robert Sveinson
Date: 10/26/2007 11:33:41 PM
"penny" <gorawen@sentex.net > wrote in message
news:tc55i39sd0l2a08tcnn2kamnc0sbvfa2ep@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:48:48 -0700, Justin Stolz <stolz_j@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>It should be clear that it is in fact the COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
>>and their Canadian counterpart the COUNCIL OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
>>that call the shots on the Hill. Harper is such a good puppy for the
>>US elite that they gave him the Woodrow Wilson Award!!!
>>
>>Depleted uranium, record poppy crops, murderous Northern Aliance, oil
>>pipelines, regional instability... and today we learn that CANADIANS
>>are paying BLACKWATER. The LOYAL opposition is silent because they
>>are sponsored by the same banksters.
>>
>>Justin Stolz, Canadian Action Party
>
>
> I know that Harpo and Day love Blackwater but paying them. Since when
> ??
>
> Do you mind giving me a reference to that. Thanks !
>
> Penny
These 2 audio clips take a while to load, but very interesting.
http://download.omroep.nl/rnw/smac/cms/tswi_blackwater_en_20071019_44_1kHz.mp3
http://download.omroep.nl/rnw/smac/cms/tswi_mercenary_en_20070119_44_1kHz.mp3
|