Group: ab.general


Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/25/2007 8:57:55 PM
<bluedevil_1950@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193344217.432884.98550@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 4:22 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:01:42 -0700, bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com wrote: >> >On Oct 25, 3:51 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> >> For those manufacturers and retailers who refuse to match US prices, >> >> they will be the subject of massive BOYCOTTS. >> >> >> As they go bankrupt because of lack of sales, their staff will be able >> >> to >> >> blame the greedy managers for the loss of their jobs. >> >> >> With the C$ now worth more than the US$, it is now so easy to go >> >> online >> >> and order anything from the USA, and save lots of money. >> >> >> With Canadian shoppers flocking to the USA to do their Christmas >> >> shopping, >> >> spending millions there, there will be lots of bankrupt Canadian >> >> businesses. >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:29:16 -0700, Leftists = traitors >> >> <rander3...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >Make less money per sale, or NO money at all. Get your prices >> >> >in-line >> >> >or go bankrupt. Work on the philosophy (so successfully implemented >> >> >in the U.S.) of selling a lot for a small profit each, instead of >> >> >small numbers of products for huge profits. This should allow you to >> >> >make MORE money in the long run since there is less competition here >> >> >than in the the U.S.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >Also keep in mind. When all those Canadian businesses go bankrupt and >> >their employees lose their jobs, YOUR taxes will increase so the >> >government can look after them. >> >It's a double edged sword. >> >> Most seniors do not make enough, to have to pay taxes, so let the greedy >> Canadian businesses go bankrupt. >> >> By the way, the unemployed business owners will have to go on welfare, >> without being entitled to collect EI.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > And YOU will be taxed to pay the EI for the employees and the wellfare > for the business owners. > There is a solution. So is it Canadian to rip off Canadian consumers? They will adjust as many people start to apply pressure and buy elsewhere. And at their profit margins today, loan sharks wish they had that action. And you know employees are not reaping the windfalls. Besides, once EI runs out, they will re-open with a new attitude.

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/25/2007 10:52:04 PM
<bluedevil_1950@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193346445.630927.299490@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 4:57 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1193344217.432884.98550@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:22 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:01:42 -0700, bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> >On Oct 25, 3:51 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> >> >> For those manufacturers and retailers who refuse to match US >> >> >> prices, >> >> >> they will be the subject of massive BOYCOTTS. >> >> >> >> As they go bankrupt because of lack of sales, their staff will be >> >> >> able >> >> >> to >> >> >> blame the greedy managers for the loss of their jobs. >> >> >> >> With the C$ now worth more than the US$, it is now so easy to go >> >> >> online >> >> >> and order anything from the USA, and save lots of money. >> >> >> >> With Canadian shoppers flocking to the USA to do their Christmas >> >> >> shopping, >> >> >> spending millions there, there will be lots of bankrupt Canadian >> >> >> businesses. >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:29:16 -0700, Leftists = traitors >> >> >> <rander3...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Make less money per sale, or NO money at all. Get your prices >> >> >> >in-line >> >> >> >or go bankrupt. Work on the philosophy (so successfully >> >> >> >implemented >> >> >> >in the U.S.) of selling a lot for a small profit each, instead of >> >> >> >small numbers of products for huge profits. This should allow you >> >> >> >to >> >> >> >make MORE money in the long run since there is less competition >> >> >> >here >> >> >> >than in the the U.S.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >Also keep in mind. When all those Canadian businesses go bankrupt and >> >> >their employees lose their jobs, YOUR taxes will increase so the >> >> >government can look after them. >> >> >It's a double edged sword. >> >> >> Most seniors do not make enough, to have to pay taxes, so let the >> >> greedy >> >> Canadian businesses go bankrupt. >> >> >> By the way, the unemployed business owners will have to go on welfare, >> >> without being entitled to collect EI.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > And YOU will be taxed to pay the EI for the employees and the wellfare >> > for the business owners. >> > There is a solution. >> >> So is it Canadian to rip off Canadian consumers? >> >> They will adjust as many people start to apply pressure and buy >> elsewhere. >> And at their profit margins today, loan sharks wish they had that action. >> And you know employees are not reaping the windfalls. >> >> Besides, once EI runs out, they will re-open with a new attitude.- Hide >> quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Cannuck 57 > Canadian retailers are not ripping of Canadian comsumers. > You of all people should know better. > The Canadian government is ripping of Canadian businesses. They can't > afford to reduce prices. You know how business is run. If 'one' > business found it profitable to sell for less, it would already be > happening. That is the way of capitalism and free enterprise. Survival > of the fittest. I'd say Canadian businesses are operating on a thin > line right now. > We need an even playing field to compete with the Americans on > pricing. We need less taxation. I hear you on the taxation. Ottawa grubbers are like groupers and blood suckers. They don't know when to let go. Maybe we need a tax payer revolt, certainly could support that. Going to the US soon to do Christmas shopping in protest. Might even buy a boat. Maybe after enough Canadian businesses hurts enough they will help us take the message to Ottawa to quite screwing with our pocket books. Maybe fire the socialist types. I for one have had it being a good little sheep. Inventory rotation should not take more than 1-3 months, which is the only sane argument I know -- a 1-3 month price lag. But what I see is a 2 1/2 year price lag. If it isn't the retailers fault, then must be the supplier. Someone is doing a gouge or is mismanaging their businesses. So if it isn't the retailer, then they should change suppliers. But it isn't going to change if Canadian shoppers are passive little sheep.

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/26/2007 1:17:43 AM
"Leftists = traitors" <rander3127@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1193358392.744854.268440@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 6:52 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> I hear you on the taxation. Ottawa grubbers are like groupers and blood >> suckers. They don't know when to let go. Maybe we need a tax payer >> revolt, >> certainly could support that. > > And it is never in the Canadian political "genetic code" to EVER > reduce the SIZE of government. Not possible. It is a gross cardinal sin in government to meaningfully reduce costs, reduce waste and get rid of defunct and counter productive legacies. And God forbid, fire some inept on the dole corrupt insider passing on political favours to those at the gates of the great Canadian cheque factory in Ottawa. We are a nation driven by government corruption.

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/26/2007 1:36:53 AM
<bluedevil_1950@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193359186.546633.200300@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 6:52 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1193346445.630927.299490@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:57 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:1193344217.432884.98550@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:22 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:01:42 -0700, bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> >> >On Oct 25, 3:51 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> For those manufacturers and retailers who refuse to match US >> >> >> >> prices, >> >> >> >> they will be the subject of massive BOYCOTTS. >> >> >> >> >> As they go bankrupt because of lack of sales, their staff will >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> able >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> blame the greedy managers for the loss of their jobs. >> >> >> >> >> With the C$ now worth more than the US$, it is now so easy to go >> >> >> >> online >> >> >> >> and order anything from the USA, and save lots of money. >> >> >> >> >> With Canadian shoppers flocking to the USA to do their Christmas >> >> >> >> shopping, >> >> >> >> spending millions there, there will be lots of bankrupt Canadian >> >> >> >> businesses. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:29:16 -0700, Leftists = traitors >> >> >> >> <rander3...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >Make less money per sale, or NO money at all. Get your prices >> >> >> >> >in-line >> >> >> >> >or go bankrupt. Work on the philosophy (so successfully >> >> >> >> >implemented >> >> >> >> >in the U.S.) of selling a lot for a small profit each, instead >> >> >> >> >of >> >> >> >> >small numbers of products for huge profits. This should allow >> >> >> >> >you >> >> >> >> >to >> >> >> >> >make MORE money in the long run since there is less competition >> >> >> >> >here >> >> >> >> >than in the the U.S.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >Also keep in mind. When all those Canadian businesses go bankrupt >> >> >> >and >> >> >> >their employees lose their jobs, YOUR taxes will increase so the >> >> >> >government can look after them. >> >> >> >It's a double edged sword. >> >> >> >> Most seniors do not make enough, to have to pay taxes, so let the >> >> >> greedy >> >> >> Canadian businesses go bankrupt. >> >> >> >> By the way, the unemployed business owners will have to go on >> >> >> welfare, >> >> >> without being entitled to collect EI.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> > And YOU will be taxed to pay the EI for the employees and the >> >> > wellfare >> >> > for the business owners. >> >> > There is a solution. >> >> >> So is it Canadian to rip off Canadian consumers? >> >> >> They will adjust as many people start to apply pressure and buy >> >> elsewhere. >> >> And at their profit margins today, loan sharks wish they had that >> >> action. >> >> And you know employees are not reaping the windfalls. >> >> >> Besides, once EI runs out, they will re-open with a new attitude.- >> >> Hide >> >> quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > Cannuck 57 >> > Canadian retailers are not ripping of Canadian comsumers. >> > You of all people should know better. >> > The Canadian government is ripping of Canadian businesses. They can't >> > afford to reduce prices. You know how business is run. If 'one' >> > business found it profitable to sell for less, it would already be >> > happening. That is the way of capitalism and free enterprise. Survival >> > of the fittest. I'd say Canadian businesses are operating on a thin >> > line right now. >> > We need an even playing field to compete with the Americans on >> > pricing. We need less taxation. >> >> I hear you on the taxation. Ottawa grubbers are like groupers and blood >> suckers. They don't know when to let go. Maybe we need a tax payer >> revolt, >> certainly could support that. >> >> Going to the US soon to do Christmas shopping in protest. Might even buy >> a >> boat. Maybe after enough Canadian businesses hurts enough they will help >> us >> take the message to Ottawa to quite screwing with our pocket books. >> Maybe >> fire the socialist types. I for one have had it being a good little >> sheep. >> >> Inventory rotation should not take more than 1-3 months, which is the >> only >> sane argument I know -- a 1-3 month price lag. But what I see is a 2 1/2 >> year price lag. If it isn't the retailers fault, then must be the >> supplier. >> Someone is doing a gouge or is mismanaging their businesses. So if it >> isn't >> the retailer, then they should change suppliers. >> >> But it isn't going to change if Canadian shoppers are passive little >> sheep.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Even inventory rotation is not the problem. I import and export. I > move the prices up and down with the Canadian dollar. Keep in mind, > when our dollar goes up in value, inventory replacement costs go down, > so it all come out in the wash. > Sometimes we gain equity, sometimes we lose. Either way, tax time > helps sort it out. Tax credits with an equity drop help soften the > blow. > Maintaining a constant profit margin is the key to retail success > regardless of dollar value. > In short. Canadian dollar up-prices down. Canadian dollar down-prices > up. > With that being said. I'd rather make 40% on a $100 sale than 40% of a > $60 sale, but that is another discussion. > Bottom line, we need lower taxes. > Canadians have cut the fat out of their personal budgets, business has > done the same. Government needs to tighten it's belt as well. > As canadians, we have to ask ourselves, can we really afford things > like bilingualism and aboriginal buy outs? > Some of this nonsense has to stop. Only joking, but elect me. I would be known as hack saw jack. 1) Cut 100B from corporate welfare, grants, corruption, payola, back door favours, CBC for sale, GM on your own, Bombardier sell at 40% below US in Canada or forget grants and tax incentives. We have enough leaches in the lakes and EI repeaters thank you. 2) Cut transfers, want socialism, no problem PAY FOR IT YOUR SELVES. And stop the blood sucking. Natives to. Get a job or rack a deer. 3) Reduce taxes immediately by at least 30%. 4) 7 years later, further 30% reduction of taxes as the debt is gone. 5) Retirees, health care intact, increase spending on these as they benefit ALL Canadians equally. 6) Pass a anti racism law, one that says ALL Canadians are EXACTLY equally in all respects, not one exception. If Quebec or natives want to complain, cut them off their welfare feeds until they comply. 7) If the unions complain, outsource it. No more public service union extortion. If you want a secure job with the indexed pension, cool, but no more strike or it is your last. 8) RCMP can actually charge corrupt government employees without repudiation. Including MPs for expense or tax fraud. 9) Felon criminals cannot vote until they are free and 10 years without a wilful offence. 10) $200 per voter tax credit. No vote, no credit. Motivate slugs to participate. 11) Referendums, yes, at least 5 per ballot including what is on the next ballot. 12) Senate, an immediate referendum to permanently retire or (EEE) elect these royal slugs. 400+ inactive bickering slugs costs too much. In the end, Canadians could choose with the financial power to select their own services, and would have the wealth to do it. Want a socialist province? Move to one. It would be glorious, but a fantasy at best.

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/26/2007 2:11:24 PM
"Viejo Vizcacha" <elbie_jovis_kasha@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:da23a$47214291$cf705692$28614@PRIMUS.CA... > I understand that places like Chad, Sierra Leone, and Congo have very low > taxation, and you do not have to support other people's children or pay > for their schools, since those children learn to fend for themselves, with > machine guns if enecessary, and there are very few schools. Needless to > say, there are no oppressive government bringing gun legislation, and the > care of the environment is left to market forces. > > Those have to be tax paradises. You should read on just how much Ottawa takes in and what they actually spend it on. Drill into the pie even further looking at detail in each it, often the spending in "health care" is side tracked with pork inside. On the top it doesn't look to bad, but peel off the covers. Oppressive government can include tax slavery. Remember the American revolution occurred when their tax rates were much less than Canadians pay today. http://www.fin.gc.ca/TaxDollar/text/html/pamphlet_e.html

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/26/2007 2:16:18 PM
"Viejo Vizcacha" <elbie_jovis_kasha@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:da23a$47214291$cf705692$28614@PRIMUS.CA... > I understand that places like Chad, Sierra Leone, and Congo have very low > taxation, and you do not have to support other people's children or pay > for their schools, since those children learn to fend for themselves, with > machine guns if enecessary, and there are very few schools. Needless to > say, there are no oppressive government bringing gun legislation, and the > care of the environment is left to market forces. > > Those have to be tax paradises. Here is a multimedia version. http://www.fin.gc.ca/taxdollar06/mm/taxdollars0506_e.html Starts of with what debt really costs. The legacy of previous dumb founded management by Ottawa. 33.8B credit charge. Totally non-productive unless your a banker. In the above, click on "Next" once each slice has shown. Proactive discloser can give some real fine details on spending, and remember above is glossed over to manage you better.

Subject: Note to Canadian retailers: You have two choices
From: Canuck57
Date: 10/26/2007 2:44:07 PM
<bluedevil_1950@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193364380.706585.86220@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 9:36 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1193359186.546633.200300@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 6:52 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:1193346445.630927.299490@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:57 pm, "Canuck57" <dave-no_s...@unixhome.net> wrote: >> >> >> <bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >>news:1193344217.432884.98550@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:22 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:01:42 -0700, bluedevil_1...@yahoo.com >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Oct 25, 3:51 pm, Ned Kelly <NedKe...@usenetexchange.com> >> >> >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> >> For those manufacturers and retailers who refuse to match US >> >> >> >> >> prices, >> >> >> >> >> they will be the subject of massive BOYCOTTS. >> >> >> >> >> >> As they go bankrupt because of lack of sales, their staff >> >> >> >> >> will >> >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> >> able >> >> >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> >> blame the greedy managers for the loss of their jobs. >> >> >> >> >> >> With the C$ now worth more than the US$, it is now so easy to >> >> >> >> >> go >> >> >> >> >> online >> >> >> >> >> and order anything from the USA, and save lots of money. >> >> >> >> >> >> With Canadian shoppers flocking to the USA to do their >> >> >> >> >> Christmas >> >> >> >> >> shopping, >> >> >> >> >> spending millions there, there will be lots of bankrupt >> >> >> >> >> Canadian >> >> >> >> >> businesses. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:29:16 -0700, Leftists = traitors >> >> >> >> >> <rander3...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >Make less money per sale, or NO money at all. Get your >> >> >> >> >> >prices >> >> >> >> >> >in-line >> >> >> >> >> >or go bankrupt. Work on the philosophy (so successfully >> >> >> >> >> >implemented >> >> >> >> >> >in the U.S.) of selling a lot for a small profit each, >> >> >> >> >> >instead >> >> >> >> >> >of >> >> >> >> >> >small numbers of products for huge profits. This should >> >> >> >> >> >allow >> >> >> >> >> >you >> >> >> >> >> >to >> >> >> >> >> >make MORE money in the long run since there is less >> >> >> >> >> >competition >> >> >> >> >> >here >> >> >> >> >> >than in the the U.S.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >Also keep in mind. When all those Canadian businesses go >> >> >> >> >bankrupt >> >> >> >> >and >> >> >> >> >their employees lose their jobs, YOUR taxes will increase so >> >> >> >> >the >> >> >> >> >government can look after them. >> >> >> >> >It's a double edged sword. >> >> >> >> >> Most seniors do not make enough, to have to pay taxes, so let >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> greedy >> >> >> >> Canadian businesses go bankrupt. >> >> >> >> >> By the way, the unemployed business owners will have to go on >> >> >> >> welfare, >> >> >> >> without being entitled to collect EI.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> > And YOU will be taxed to pay the EI for the employees and the >> >> >> > wellfare >> >> >> > for the business owners. >> >> >> > There is a solution. >> >> >> >> So is it Canadian to rip off Canadian consumers? >> >> >> >> They will adjust as many people start to apply pressure and buy >> >> >> elsewhere. >> >> >> And at their profit margins today, loan sharks wish they had that >> >> >> action. >> >> >> And you know employees are not reaping the windfalls. >> >> >> >> Besides, once EI runs out, they will re-open with a new attitude.- >> >> >> Hide >> >> >> quoted text - >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> > Cannuck 57 >> >> > Canadian retailers are not ripping of Canadian comsumers. >> >> > You of all people should know better. >> >> > The Canadian government is ripping of Canadian businesses. They >> >> > can't >> >> > afford to reduce prices. You know how business is run. If 'one' >> >> > business found it profitable to sell for less, it would already be >> >> > happening. That is the way of capitalism and free enterprise. >> >> > Survival >> >> > of the fittest. I'd say Canadian businesses are operating on a thin >> >> > line right now. >> >> > We need an even playing field to compete with the Americans on >> >> > pricing. We need less taxation. >> >> >> I hear you on the taxation. Ottawa grubbers are like groupers and >> >> blood >> >> suckers. They don't know when to let go. Maybe we need a tax payer >> >> revolt, >> >> certainly could support that. >> >> >> Going to the US soon to do Christmas shopping in protest. Might even >> >> buy >> >> a >> >> boat. Maybe after enough Canadian businesses hurts enough they will >> >> help >> >> us >> >> take the message to Ottawa to quite screwing with our pocket books. >> >> Maybe >> >> fire the socialist types. I for one have had it being a good little >> >> sheep. >> >> >> Inventory rotation should not take more than 1-3 months, which is the >> >> only >> >> sane argument I know -- a 1-3 month price lag. But what I see is a 2 >> >> 1/2 >> >> year price lag. If it isn't the retailers fault, then must be the >> >> supplier. >> >> Someone is doing a gouge or is mismanaging their businesses. So if it >> >> isn't >> >> the retailer, then they should change suppliers. >> >> >> But it isn't going to change if Canadian shoppers are passive little >> >> sheep.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > Even inventory rotation is not the problem. I import and export. I >> > move the prices up and down with the Canadian dollar. Keep in mind, >> > when our dollar goes up in value, inventory replacement costs go down, >> > so it all come out in the wash. >> > Sometimes we gain equity, sometimes we lose. Either way, tax time >> > helps sort it out. Tax credits with an equity drop help soften the >> > blow. >> > Maintaining a constant profit margin is the key to retail success >> > regardless of dollar value. >> > In short. Canadian dollar up-prices down. Canadian dollar down-prices >> > up. >> > With that being said. I'd rather make 40% on a $100 sale than 40% of a >> > $60 sale, but that is another discussion. >> > Bottom line, we need lower taxes. >> > Canadians have cut the fat out of their personal budgets, business has >> > done the same. Government needs to tighten it's belt as well. >> > As canadians, we have to ask ourselves, can we really afford things >> > like bilingualism and aboriginal buy outs? >> > Some of this nonsense has to stop. >> >> Only joking, but elect me. I would be known as hack saw jack. >> >> 1) Cut 100B from corporate welfare, grants, corruption, payola, back door >> favours, CBC for sale, GM on your own, Bombardier sell at 40% below US in >> Canada or forget grants and tax incentives. We have enough leaches in >> the >> lakes and EI repeaters thank you. >> >> 2) Cut transfers, want socialism, no problem PAY FOR IT YOUR SELVES. And >> stop the blood sucking. Natives to. Get a job or rack a deer. >> >> 3) Reduce taxes immediately by at least 30%. >> >> 4) 7 years later, further 30% reduction of taxes as the debt is gone. >> >> 5) Retirees, health care intact, increase spending on these as they >> benefit >> ALL Canadians equally. >> >> 6) Pass a anti racism law, one that says ALL Canadians are EXACTLY >> equally >> in all respects, not one exception. If Quebec or natives want to >> complain, >> cut them off their welfare feeds until they comply. >> >> 7) If the unions complain, outsource it. No more public service union >> extortion. If you want a secure job with the indexed pension, cool, but >> no >> more strike or it is your last. >> >> 8) RCMP can actually charge corrupt government employees without >> repudiation. Including MPs for expense or tax fraud. >> >> 9) Felon criminals cannot vote until they are free and 10 years without a >> wilful offence. >> >> 10) $200 per voter tax credit. No vote, no credit. Motivate slugs to >> participate. >> >> 11) Referendums, yes, at least 5 per ballot including what is on the next >> ballot. >> >> 12) Senate, an immediate referendum to permanently retire or (EEE) elect >> these royal slugs. 400+ inactive bickering slugs costs too much. >> >> In the end, Canadians could choose with the financial power to select >> their >> own services, and would have the wealth to do it. Want a socialist >> province? Move to one. >> >> It would be glorious, but a fantasy at best.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > You'd have my vote. Too bad Canada couldn't go that way. It certainly > needs to. On the bright side, at least we all have had one good > discussion on here on usenet without a lot of name calling. I wish we > could do more of that. Agreed. We need less flame throwing, copy type and cheap shots. But it does show the mentality of many.